Stock Returns, Implied Volatility Innovations, and the Asymmetric Volatility Phenomenon

Posted: 6 Sep 2005

See all articles by Chris T. Stivers

Chris T. Stivers

University of Louisville

Patrick J. Dennis

University of Virginia - McIntire School of Commerce

Stewart Mayhew

Cornerstone Research

Abstract

We study the dynamic relation between daily stock returns and daily innovations in option-derived implied volatilities. By simultaneously analyzing innovations in index-level and firm-level implied volatilities, we distinguish between innovations in systematic and idiosyncratic volatility in an effort to better understand the asymmetric volatility phenomenon. Our results indicate that the relation between stock returns and innovations in systematic volatility (idiosyncratic volatility) is substantially negative (near zero). These results suggest that asymmetric volatility is primarily attributed to systematic market-wide factors, rather than aggregated firm-level effects. We also present evidence that supports our assumption that innovations in implied volatility are good proxies for innovations in expected stock volatility.

Keywords: Implied Volatility, Asymmetric Volatility Phenomenon

JEL Classification: G12, G14, D80

Suggested Citation

Stivers, Chris T. and Dennis, Patrick J. and Mayhew, Stewart, Stock Returns, Implied Volatility Innovations, and the Asymmetric Volatility Phenomenon. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 41, pp. 381-406, June 2006, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=794789

Chris T. Stivers (Contact Author)

University of Louisville ( email )

Finance Dept., College of Business
University of Louisville
Louisville, KY 40292
United States
502-852-4829 (Phone)

Patrick J. Dennis

University of Virginia - McIntire School of Commerce ( email )

P.O. Box 400173
Charlottesville, VA 22904-4173
United States
804-924-4050 (Phone)

Stewart Mayhew

Cornerstone Research ( email )

1919 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Suite 600
Washington, DC 20006-3420
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
1,747
PlumX Metrics