William III and the Legalist Revolution

20 Pages Posted: 3 Nov 2011 Last revised: 3 Feb 2013

See all articles by Richard S. Kay

Richard S. Kay

University of Connecticut School of Law

Date Written: November 3, 2000

Abstract

The new king recoiled from suggestions that he declare himself a conqueror, and his regime deviated from such legal protection as habeas corpus with the greatest reluctance. William was not content with the assent of the Lords to the calling of a convention. But with the reopening of the courts, it was to be expected that writs of habeas corpus would be sued out again. A bill was quickly proposed to allow the king to commit for two or three months such persons as he shall suspect to be obnoxious without the benefit of habeas corpus. The suspension of habeas corpus was, no doubt, a bitter remedy. The Whig and former Lord Mayor, Sir Robert Clayton, who supported it, noted that [h]ad it not been for the Habeas Corpus Act, there had not been many of us here now; we had been dead and rotten in prison. Clarges advised rather that great security should be demanded for the prisoners' appearance than that Bill [the Habeas Corpus Act] should be entrenched upon; a thing so sacred.

Keywords: Revolution

JEL Classification: K40

Suggested Citation

Kay, Richard S, William III and the Legalist Revolution (November 3, 2000). Connecticut Law Review, Vol. 32, p. 1645, Summer 2000, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=828226

Richard S Kay (Contact Author)

University of Connecticut School of Law ( email )

65 Elizabeth Street
Hartford, CT 06105
United States
860-570-5262 (Phone)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
34
Abstract Views
470
PlumX Metrics