The Conviction of Lynne Stewart and the Uncertain Future of the Right to Defend

52 Pages Posted: 3 Mar 2006 Last revised: 8 Aug 2008

See all articles by Tamar R. Birckhead

Tamar R. Birckhead

Yale Law School; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Law

Abstract

At the heart of the attorney-client relationship lies the ability to communicate freely and without fear that someone is listening. Since 9/11, the government has passed regulations, such as the Special Administrative Measures ("SAMs"), that by virtue of their broad scope and lack of procedural safeguards have endangered this privilege, particularly for incarcerated criminal defendants. The recent conviction of attorney Lynne Stewart for providing material support to a foreign terrorist organization has brought this issue to the forefront, as the prosecution relied upon government-monitored conversations between Stewart and her client, convicted terrorist Sheik Abdel Rahman, to prove its case against her. This Article argues that post-9/11 administrative mechanisms such as the SAMs represent a classic case of governmental overreaching, one that is in line with a long history of compromising civil liberties and limiting access to the courts during periods of war and national anxiety. It analyzes the effects of such mechanisms upon criminal defendants and those who represent them, and uses Lynne Stewart's conviction as a lens through which to examine the history that brought us to this point as well as serving as a concrete example of what can, and does, happen when rules regulating the bounds of proper legal advocacy are violated. It concludes by demonstrating that although effective defense strategies may temper the impact of certain aspects of the SAMs, the regulations' very existence has the potential to "chill" the attorney-client relationship and thereby threaten the Sixth Amendment - a reality the courts have yet to acknowledge.

Keywords: attorney-client relationship, criminal defense

Suggested Citation

Birckhead, Tamar R., The Conviction of Lynne Stewart and the Uncertain Future of the Right to Defend. American Criminal Law Review, Vol. 43, 2006, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=887747

Tamar R. Birckhead (Contact Author)

Yale Law School ( email )

P.O. Box 208215
New Haven, CT 06520-8215
United States

HOME PAGE: http://https://www.law.yale.edu/tamar-birckhead

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Law ( email )

Van Hecke-Wettach Hall, 160 Ridge Road
CB #3380
Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3380
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
134
Abstract Views
3,959
Rank
385,726
PlumX Metrics