The As-Is Journal Review Process: Let Authors Own Their Ideas
IEW Working Paper No. 280
24 Pages Posted: 27 Apr 2006
Date Written: April 2006
Abstract
Recently, the problems associated with the existing journal review process aroused discussions from seasoned management researchers, who have also made useful suggestions for improving the process. To complement these suggestions, we propose a more radical change: a manuscript should be reviewed on an as is basis and its fate be determined in one round of review. The as-is review process shortens the time period from submission to final acceptance, reduces the workload of editors, referees and authors, provides frank author feedback to referees, and, most important, lets authors own all of the ideas in their publications.
Keywords: Journals, reviews, authors, submissions
JEL Classification: Z0
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Publishing as Prostitution? Choosing between One's Own Ideas and Academic Failure
-
How Much Better are the Most Prestigious Journals? The Statistics of Academic Publication
-
Signals in Science - on the Importance of Signaling in Gaining Attention in Science
By Hendrik P. Van Dalen and Kene Henkens
-
Rigor and Relevance in Organization Studies: Idea Migration and Academic Journal Evolution
By Richard L. Daft and Arie Y. Lewin
-
Diversity in Economics: An Analysis of Journal Quality Perceptions