The Story of Mary Sue and Junior Davis

22 Pages Posted: 27 Apr 2006

Date Written: April 2006

Abstract

Davis v. Davis appears in many property books as well as some casebooks about family law. It features property rights in unique goods, and stimulates discussion about whether embryos should be the subject of court decisions, much less market transactions. Davis touches on ideas of commensurability, self, and dignity.

The story of Junior and Mary Sue Davis can also be seen as a cautionary tale about a family destroyed by lost pregnancies and the havoc this causes in a marriage. Once the centripetal forces reach gale strength, Davis turns into a power struggle at an elemental level, one in which middle class former spouses are willing to pay huge sums to litigate, and publicly vent their plight and their disaffection. What is most intimate and private becomes the subject of mainstream television programming, editorial commentary and continued fame, even 15 years later. This piece will address the question about why having a genetic child first became so important that Junior and Mary Sue would spend more than their combined yearly salaries on IVF and the even more experimental cryopreservation technique. It will discuss why bearing a child might ultimately have become less meaningful than possessing the right to disposal of the frozen embryos, and thus why first Junior and then Mary Sue changed their minds.

Keywords: Davis, embryo, cryopreservation, property, abortion, ART, artificial reproduction

JEL Classification: J12, J13, K39

Suggested Citation

Friedlander Brinig, Margaret, The Story of Mary Sue and Junior Davis (April 2006). U Iowa Legal Studies Research Paper No. 05-49, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=899104 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.899104

Margaret Friedlander Brinig (Contact Author)

Notre Dame Law School ( email )

P.O. Box 780
3157 Eck Hall of Law
Notre Dame, IN 46556-0780
United States
574-631-2303 (Phone)
574-631=8078 (Fax)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
225
Abstract Views
3,125
Rank
245,280
PlumX Metrics