Voter Identification

67 Pages Posted: 13 Jun 2006

See all articles by Spencer Overton

Spencer Overton

George Washington University - Law School

Abstract

In the wake of closely contested elections, calls for laws that require voters to present photo identification as a condition to cast a ballot have become pervasive. Advocates tend to rely on two rhetorical devices: (1) anecdotes about a couple of elections tainted by voter fraud; and (2) common sense arguments that voters should produce photo identification because the cards are required to board airplanes, buy alcohol, and engage in other activities. This Article explains the analytical shortcomings of anecdote, analogy, and intuition, and applies a cost-benefit approach generally overlooked in election law scholarship. Rather than rushing to impose a photo identification requirement for voting, policymakers should instead examine empirical data to weigh the costs and benefits of such a requirement. Existing data suggests that the number of legitimate voters who would fail to bring photo identification to the polls is several times higher than the number of fraudulent voters, and that a photo identification requirement would produce political outcomes that are less reflective of the electorate as a whole. Policymakers should await better empirical studies before imposing potentially antidemocratic measures. Judges, in turn, should demand statistical data to ensure that voter identification procedures are appropriately tailored to deter fraudulent voters rather than legitimate ones and do not disproportionately exclude protected classes of voters.

Keywords: elections, voter identification, empirical studies

JEL Classification: K23, J71

Suggested Citation

Overton, Spencer, Voter Identification. Michigan Law Review, 2006, GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 210, GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 210, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=908371

Spencer Overton (Contact Author)

George Washington University - Law School ( email )

2000 H Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20052
United States
202-994-9794 (Phone)
202-994-9817 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.gwu.edu/facweb/soverton/

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
223
Abstract Views
2,762
Rank
248,552
PlumX Metrics