Legal Capital: An Outdated Concept?
18 Pages Posted: 23 Jun 2006
Abstract
This paper reviews the case for and against mandatory legal capital rules in European corporate codes. It is argued that legal capital is no longer an appropriate means of safeguarding creditors' interests. This is most clearly the case as regards mandatory rules. Moreover, it is suggested that even an 'opt in' (or default) legal capital regime is unlikely to be a useful mechanism. However, the advent of regulatory arbitrage in European corporate law will provide a way of gathering information regarding investors' preferences in relation to such rules. Those creditor protection rules that do not further the interests of adjusting creditors will become subject to competitive pressures. Legislatures will be faced with the task of designing mandatory rules to deal with the issues raised by 'non-adjusting' creditors in a proportionate and effective manner, consistent with the Gebhard formula.
Keywords: G32, G38, K12, K22
JEL Classification: Corporate Law, Creditor Protection, Legal Capital
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Intellectual Property as Property: Delineating Entitlements in Information
-
Augmenting the Value of Ownership by Protecting it Only Partially: The 'Market-Overt' Rule Revisited
By Barak Medina
-
The Proprietary Foundations of Corporate Law
By John Armour and Michael J. Whincop
-
The Firm as an Entity Before the Companies Acts
By Joshua Getzler and Mike Macnair