Adequate Access or Equal Treatment: Looking Beyond the Idea to Section 504 in a Post-Schaffer Public School

Stanford Law Review, Vol. 58, pp. 1563-1622, 2006

National Association of Counsel for Children, The Specialized Practice of Juvenile Law: Model Practice in Model Offices, pp. 233-276, 2006

61 Pages Posted: 8 Aug 2006

Abstract

In light of the Supreme Court's decision this Term in Schaffer v. Weast, this Note analyzes the current state of special education law and argues that parents, attorneys, and advocates should look beyond the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) to Section 504 in the post-Schaffer public school. This Note shows how these two standards operate in the context of state special schools for the blind and deaf. A state-by-state survey of thirty states' special school admission policies and practices reveals the IDEA's limitations and Section 504's potentially complementary role.

Although other works have briefly compared the IDEA and Section 504, this Note is the first post-Schaffer comparison and also the first to use a specific policy context to demonstrate how the two statutes interact and complement each other; it is also the first published study on the exclusion of multi-disabled students from state special schools. As the state special school context illustrates, Section 504 is a powerful, yet oft-neglected, complement to the IDEA. Whereas the IDEA focuses on adequate access to a free appropriate public education (FAPE), Section 504 emphasizes equal treatment within federally funded programs. This Note advocates that policymakers and special education attorneys understand how to utilize both Section 504 and the IDEA in order to make sure that no child is left behind or otherwise excluded from educational opportunities solely on the basis of a disability. This understanding is particularly important in the post-Schaffer public school.

Keywords: education, special education, section 504, IDEA, blind, deaf

Suggested Citation

Walker, Christopher J., Adequate Access or Equal Treatment: Looking Beyond the Idea to Section 504 in a Post-Schaffer Public School. Stanford Law Review, Vol. 58, pp. 1563-1622, 2006, National Association of Counsel for Children, The Specialized Practice of Juvenile Law: Model Practice in Model Offices, pp. 233-276, 2006, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=922181

Christopher J. Walker (Contact Author)

University of Michigan Law School ( email )

625 South State Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1215
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.chrisjwalker.com

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
538
Abstract Views
2,343
Rank
95,064
PlumX Metrics