Legal Blogs and the Supreme Court Confirmation Process

U Iowa Legal Studies Research Paper No. 06-05

Nexus: A Journal of Opinion, Vol. 11, p. 79, 2006 (Chapman University School of Law, Orange, CA)

11 Pages Posted: 6 Sep 2006

See all articles by Tung Yin

Tung Yin

Lewis & Clark College Paul L Boley Library

Abstract

Blogs are like television: potentially a terrific educational tool, but often just pedestrian entertainment. While legal bloggers can hope that their blogs are different, there are only a few notable examples of legal bloggers having leveraged their blogs for professional purposes. And the legal academy is still coming to grips with blogging: is it scholarship, public service, or just a hobby?

Yet legal blogs are having an important impact on the Supreme Court confirmation process. Supreme Court nominations are relatively rare events, even though 2005 saw not one, but three nominees: John Roberts, Harriet Miers, and Samuel Alito. Although the nomination process occurs infrequently, the impact of legal blogging on the Supreme Court confirmation process may shed light on other areas where legal blogging will impact the legal community.

Keywords: blogs, supreme court confirmation process, legal blogs, supreme court nominations

Suggested Citation

Yin, Tung, Legal Blogs and the Supreme Court Confirmation Process. U Iowa Legal Studies Research Paper No. 06-05, Nexus: A Journal of Opinion, Vol. 11, p. 79, 2006 (Chapman University School of Law, Orange, CA), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=928000

Tung Yin (Contact Author)

Lewis & Clark College Paul L Boley Library ( email )

10015 S.W. Terwilliger Blvd.
Portland, OR 97219
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
96
Abstract Views
1,466
Rank
492,371
PlumX Metrics