Assurer Reputation for Competence in a Multi-Service Context
45 Pages Posted: 7 Dec 2006
Abstract
We experimentally examine determinants of the transferability and durability of an assurer's flagship-service reputation for competence in a multi-service context. Economic and psychology theories agree that transferability will increase when a new service and a flagship service require relatively similar, as opposed to relatively dissimilar, competencies. These theories disagree, however, regarding the durability of an assurer's flagship-service reputation following a performance failure in a new service.
Economic theory requires some reciprocity for transferability and durability, and, accordingly, predicts that a new-service failure will inflict more damage on a flagship-service reputation when the new and flagship services require relatively similar, as opposed to relatively dissimilar, competencies. Psychology theory, in contrast, predicts that a new-service failure will tend not to damage the flagship-service reputation, even when the new and flagship services require relatively similar competencies. Thus, unlike economic theory, psychology theory predicts that relatively similar competencies between a new and a flagship service can improve the transferability of an assurer's flagship-service reputation for competence without reciprocally threatening its durability.
Experimental findings indicate that reputation transferability increases when the new and flagship services require relatively similar, as opposed to relatively dissimilar, competencies. They also indicate that a new-service failure damages the flagship-service reputation only when, and to a greater degree when, the new and flagship services require relatively dissimilar, as opposed to relatively similar, competencies. Thus, empirically, greater similarity in the competencies required by a new and flagship service simultaneously enhances the transferability and durability of the assurer's flagship-service reputation. These empirical findings are better explained by psychology theory than by economic theory.
Keywords: reputation, competence, assurance services, auditing
JEL Classification: C92, D20, D80, G20, L11, L21, M31, M40, N20
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Experimental Research in Financial Accounting
By Robert Libby, Robert J. Bloomfield, ...
-
Comprehensive Income Disclosures and Analysts' Valuation Judgments
By D. Eric Hirst and Patrick E. Hopkins
-
Fair Values, Comprehensive Income Reporting, and Bank Analysts' Risk and Valuation Judgments
By D. Eric Hirst, Patrick E. Hopkins, ...
-
Purchase, Pooling, and Equity Analysts' Valuation Judgments
By Patrick E. Hopkins, Richard W. Houston, ...
-
Directional Preferences, Information Processing, and Investors' Forecasts of Earnings
-
The 'Incomplete Revelation Hypothesis' and Financial Reporting
-
Using Psychology Theories in Archival Financial Accounting Research
By Lisa Koonce and Molly Mercer
-
Cheap Talk, Fraud and Adverse Selection in Financial Markets: Some Experimental Evidence
By Robert Forsythe, Russell J. Lundholm, ...