The De-Differentiation Problem

29 Pages Posted: 2 Apr 2007 Last revised: 2 Apr 2009

See all articles by Pierre Schlag

Pierre Schlag

University of Colorado Law School

Abstract

This article demonstrates that our more sophisticated theories of law lead us to a point where we are no longer able to distinguish law from culture, or society, or the market, or politics or anything of the sort. Not only are the various terms inextricably intertwined (something that other thinkers have observed) but we are no longer in a position to articulate any relations between these various terms at all. It is with this latter realization that the de-differentiation problem kicks in. Because the various terms cannot be disentangled, we find ourselves in the odd position where there is nothing of any positive character to be said about their relations. Each is already the other and, thus, they can have no relation. This is rather bad news for the ways in which we have traditionally conceived theories of law -- indeed any theory that gets off the ground by distinguishing law from a discrete something else (which, on first glance, would seem to include all legal theory).

Keywords: dedifferentiation, law, interpretation, conceptual indeterminacy, reification, causation, aesthetics

JEL Classification: K19, K39, K49

Suggested Citation

Schlag, Pierre, The De-Differentiation Problem. University of Colorado Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 07-09, 41 Cont. Phil. Rev. 35 (2009), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=975810

Pierre Schlag (Contact Author)

University of Colorado Law School ( email )

UCB 401
Boulder, CO colorado 80309
United States
303-492-3110 (Phone)
303-492-1200 (Fax)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
353
Abstract Views
1,848
Rank
156,742
PlumX Metrics