Does it Pay to Consistently Meet Analysts' Earnings Expectations?
43 Pages Posted: 22 Jan 2003
Date Written: September 2007
Abstract
In this paper, we investigate the market reward to firms that consistently meet or exceed analysts' consensus forecasts over the entire horizon over which a pattern of consistent meet/beat is exhibited. Our results support the existence of a positive market response over the entire horizon. We document that this incremental valuation premium increases with the length of the strategy horizon over which MEET behavior persists, and that MEET firms enjoy significantly higher valuations of income and book value of equity than do NONMEET firms. Finally, we document that there has been a temporal shift in the way the market values the MEET strategy in that there is greater premium (penalty) for meeting /beating (missing) of earnings expectations.
Keywords: Analysts, Earnings Forecasts, Valuation, Expectation Management, Earnings Management, Self-selection
JEL Classification: G14, G14, G29, M41
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Detecting Earnings Management: A New Approach
By Patricia Dechow, Amy P. Hutton, ...
-
A Review of the Earnings Management Literature and its Implications for Standard Setting
-
Errors in Estimating Accruals: Implications for Empirical Research
By Daniel W. Collins and Paul Hribar
-
The Economic Implications of Corporate Financial Reporting
By John R. Graham, Campbell R. Harvey, ...
-
The Economic Implications of Corporate Financial Reporting
By John R. Graham, Campbell R. Harvey, ...
-
On the Association between Voluntary Disclosure and Earnings Management
By Ron Kasznik
-
Performance Matched Discretionary Accrual Measures
By S.p. Kothari, Andrew J. Leone, ...
-
The Quality of Accruals and Earnings: The Role of Accrual Estimation Errors
By Ilia D. Dichev and Patricia Dechow