Patient Advocacy Group Collaboration in Genetic Research and the Scope of 'Joint Inventorship' Under U.S. Patent Law

International Journal of Intellectual Property Management, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 97-109, 2009

13 Pages Posted: 28 Jul 2009 Last revised: 28 Feb 2018

See all articles by Jordan Paradise

Jordan Paradise

Loyola University Chicago School of Law

Date Written: April 27, 2007

Abstract

Patent systems have traditionally operated to reward scientific innovation and discovery rather than the level and type of contribution of raw materials and other support. As U.S. and international patient advocacy groups continue to launch efforts to organize patients, collect and bank genetic material, and interface with researchers to find cures for diseases, there is need for critical examination of the scope of inventorship as constructed both in the U.S. patent law and abroad. In recently naming a non-scientist advocate a co-inventor on a patent covering a disease gene, the United States Patent & Trademark Office has determined that collaboration with researchers in providing banked genetic samples and participating in the laboratory rises to the level of inventorship. This article will review case law and U.S. patent law and discuss recent patient advocacy collaborative efforts. It will conclude with some considerations for fostering continued collaborative efforts in genetics research.

Suggested Citation

Paradise, Jordan K., Patient Advocacy Group Collaboration in Genetic Research and the Scope of 'Joint Inventorship' Under U.S. Patent Law (April 27, 2007). International Journal of Intellectual Property Management, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 97-109, 2009, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=983115

Jordan K. Paradise (Contact Author)

Loyola University Chicago School of Law ( email )

25 E. Pearson
Chicago, IL 60611
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
34
Abstract Views
1,372
PlumX Metrics