Democracy and British Plantation Colonialism
23 Pages Posted: 19 Jul 2010 Last revised: 6 Aug 2010
Date Written: 2010
Abstract
This paper explores why former British plantation colonies have relatively high levels of democracy through an analysis of one positive case (Mauritius) and one negative case (Guyana). The analysis finds that Mauritius developed an effective democratic system during the final years of colonialism. It was made possible through extensive political reforms backed by strong societal support and a relatively effective state capable of implementing them. Alternatively, similar political reforms did not occur in Guyana because of intense conflict between the colonized and the colonizers and between Indo-Guyanan and Afro-Guyanan communities. Even more, the conflict weakened the state and promoted autocratic rule.
Keywords: Plantations, British Colonialism, Democracy, Mauritius, Guyana
JEL Classification: H70, H11
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Justice Without Borders: Prosecuting General Pinochet
By Nehal Bhuta
-
Argentina's Pathway Through Financial Crisis
By Brad Setser and Anna Gelpern
-
Globalisation and the 'Paradox of State Power': Perspectives from Latin America
-
The Concept of 'Crisis': What Can We Learn from the Two Dictatorships of L. Quinctius Cincinnatus?
By Oren Gross
-
A Catastrophe Foretold: Economic Reform, Crisis, Recovery and Employment in Argentina
-
The Myth of American Exceptionalism and the Tragedy of Neoconservative Foreign Policy
-
The Clash of Commitments at the International Criminal Court
By Tom Ginsburg
-
Fighting Piracy in Somalia (and Elsewhere): Why More is Needed