Investing in Sustainability or Feeding on Stranded Assets? The Norwegian Government Pension Fund Global

32 Pages Posted: 19 Jun 2017 Last revised: 3 Mar 2021

See all articles by Beate Sjåfjell

Beate Sjåfjell

University of Oslo - Faculty of Law; College of Europe - European Legal Studies Department

Heidi Rapp Nilsen

Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)

Benjamin J. Richardson

University of Tasmania - Faculty of Law

Date Written: June 19, 2017

Abstract

We know that access to finance is crucial if we are to achieve the fundamental transition necessary to meet the grand challenge of our time: securing a safe and just operating space within the planetary boundaries. In the era of global market capitalism and deregulation, Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWFs) offer one of the few public economic institutions capable of injecting ecological and social values into global markets. This paper undertakes a case study of the world’s largest SWF, the Norwegian Government Pension Global.

The Norwegian Fund is well-known for its ethical profile. This includes exclusion of companies based on products (tobacco, certain weapons, and most recently also coal), and observation and potential exclusion based on conduct (including severe violations of human rights, severe environmental damage, gross corruption and other particularly severe violations of fundamental ethical norms), as well as the Fund’s public statements when withdrawing from companies based on conduct in the cases when its attempts at influencing the companies have failed.

The principal thesis of the article is that a misleading dichotomy between ethics and economics has held the Norwegian Fund back from contributing to sustainability, leaving the majority of the Fund’s investments on an unsustainable path of ‘business as usual’. Although there are positive indications, major changes are necessary to realise the Fund’s potential to invest in sustainability.

Suggested Citation

Sjåfjell, Beate and Nilsen, Heidi Rapp and Richardson, Benjamin J., Investing in Sustainability or Feeding on Stranded Assets? The Norwegian Government Pension Fund Global (June 19, 2017). Wake Forest Law Review (2017), volume 52, issue 4, pp. 949-979, University of Oslo Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 2017-29, Nordic & European Company Law Working Paper No. 16-29, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2988816 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2988816

Beate Sjåfjell (Contact Author)

University of Oslo - Faculty of Law ( email )

PO Box 6706 St Olavsplass
Oslo, 0130
Norway

HOME PAGE: http://www.jus.uio.no/ifp/english/people/aca/beatesj/

College of Europe - European Legal Studies Department ( email )

Dijver 11
B-8000 Brugge, Oost Vlanderen 10000
Belgium

Heidi Rapp Nilsen

Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) ( email )

Benjamin J. Richardson

University of Tasmania - Faculty of Law ( email )

Private Bag 89
Hobart, Tasmania 7001
Australia

HOME PAGE: http://www.utas.edu.au/law

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
364
Abstract Views
5,339
Rank
150,248
PlumX Metrics