Disincentives to Activism by Institutional Investors in Listed Australian Companies

Sydney Law Review, Vol. 18, No. 2, (June 1996).

Posted: 21 Jun 1998

Abstract

Several commentators have expressed the view that a greater level of monitoring by institutional shareholders would be a positive development in corporate governance. However, such commentators often rely upon mere exhortation as a means of achieving that end. The central aim of this paper is to show that there is an array of disincentives to the performance of detailed firm-level monitoring by institutional investors in listed Australian companies. The paper analyzes the barriers to detailed monitoring under three headings: (i) legal barriers; (ii) economic barriers; and (iii) practical and political barriers. It is argued that economic barriers are the most significant of these three types. The paper incorporates the results of an interview study conducted by the author in 1994. The interviewees were the senior executive, or a senior fund manager, of 13 major Australian investment management firms. These firms included the five largest, and seven of the eight largest, managers of listed Australian equities at the end of 1993.

JEL Classification: G32, G34

Suggested Citation

Stapledon, Geofrey P., Disincentives to Activism by Institutional Investors in Listed Australian Companies. Sydney Law Review, Vol. 18, No. 2, (June 1996)., Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=10074

Geofrey P. Stapledon (Contact Author)

University of Melbourne - Law School ( email )

Victoria 3010
Australia
+61 3 8344 8916 (Phone)
+61 3 8344 9971 (Fax)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
824
PlumX Metrics