In Defense of the Use of Commonsense Psychology in the Criminal Law
Posted: 29 Aug 2007
Abstract
The criminal law depends upon 'commonsense' or 'folk' psychology, a seemingly innate theory used by all normal human beings as a means to understand and predict other humans' behavior. This paper discusses two major types of arguments that commonsense psychology is not a true theory of human behavior, and thus should be eliminated and replaced. The paper argues that eliminitivist projects fail to provide evidence that commonsense psychology is a false theory, and argues that there is no need to seek a replacement theory of behavior for use in the criminal law.
Keywords: commonsense psychology, folk psychology, eliminativism, criminal law
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Sifferd, Katrina, In Defense of the Use of Commonsense Psychology in the Criminal Law. Law and Philosophy, Vol. 25, 2006, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1010177
Feedback
Feedback to SSRN
If you need immediate assistance, call 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 212 448 2500 outside of the United States, 8:30AM to 6:00PM U.S. Eastern, Monday - Friday.