The FTC and the New Paternalism
65 Pages Posted: 16 Sep 2007
Date Written: September 14, 2007
Abstract
During the past decade, we have witnessed a renaissance of paternalism in legal scholarship fueled by the rise of behavioral law and economics ("BLE"). This paper addresses the potential impact of BLE and the "new paternalism" on the Federal Trade Commission's consumer protection mission. After providing a survey of some of the basic teachings of BLE, the paper reviews the fascinating political and legal history of the FTC's unfairness authority to show how a major political battle helped to transform the legal concept of unfairness from a market morality norm into a law and economics concept grounded in the concept of consumer sovereignty.
The latter parts of the paper use three examples - mail-in consumer rebates, inducement of supermarket impulse purchases, and payday lending - to explore the challenges that the FTC faces if it decides to press unfairness claims based on alleged behavioral exploitation. These tasks include weighing uncertain costs and benefits of business practices, determining what harms are "reasonably avoidable" in cases of purported consumer irrationality, and elaborating a principle to mediate disputes between consumers' multiple selves. Given these empirical and normative challenges, and the FTC's unfairness history, one might expect the Commission to be cautious in its use of BLE and resistant to more radical strains of the new paternalism.
Keywords: Federal Trade Commission, FTC, unfairness, behavioral law and economics, paternalism, BLE, consumer rebates, payday lending, impulse buying, law and economics
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
The Economist as Therapist: Methodological Ramifications of 'Light' Paternalism
-
Towards a New Model of Consumer Protection: The Problem of Inflated Transaction Costs
By Jeff Sovern
-
An Offer You Cannot Negotiate: Some Thoughts on the Economics of Standard Form Consumer Contracts
-
E-Contract Doctrine 2.0: Standard Form Contracting in the Age of Online User Participation
By Samuel Becher and Tal Zarsky
-
False Consensus Bias in Contract Interpretation
By Lawrence M. Solan, Terri Rosenblatt, ...
-
Behavioural Economics in Unfair Contract Terms Cautions and Considerations
By Michael G. Faure and Hanneke A. Luth
-
By Rina Kikuchi and Kazuki Onji