Evidentialism and James' Argument from Friendship

8 Pages Posted: 7 Oct 2007 Last revised: 10 Oct 2007

See all articles by Scott F. Aikin

Scott F. Aikin

Vanderbilt University - Philosophy Department

Date Written: October 5, 2007

Abstract

William James' main argument in "The Will to Believe" against evidentialism is that there are facts that cannot come to be without a preliminary faith in their coming. James primarily makes this case with the argument from friendship. I will critically present James' argument from friendship and show that the argument does not yield a counter-example to evidentialism and is in the end unsound.

Keywords: evidentialism, justification, ethics of belief, pragmatism, will to believe

Suggested Citation

Aikin, Scott F., Evidentialism and James' Argument from Friendship (October 5, 2007). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1019535 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1019535

Scott F. Aikin (Contact Author)

Vanderbilt University - Philosophy Department ( email )

2301 Vanderbilt Place
Nashville, TN 37240
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
282
Abstract Views
1,737
Rank
198,883
PlumX Metrics