Accelerated Stock Repurchase Programs: Underreported and Overpriced? Part II (Hewlett-Packard Addendum)
13 Pages Posted: 23 Oct 2007 Last revised: 22 Jun 2016
Date Written: October 23, 2007
Abstract
The current study adds consideration of a $1.7 billion accelerated stock repurchase (ASR) by Hewlett-Packard (HP) to a recent analysis of 2006-2007 ASRs by Applied Materials, Cypress Semiconductor, Linear Technology, and Xilinx. The HP addition to company case studies leaves fundamental findings on ASRs unchanged including:
1) Liability (ASRs are denied a 10b-18 safe harbor) 2) Disturbing, pre-deal, stock activity (prices rise 10% pre-deal) 3) Idiosyncratic, incomplete, and sometimes misleading disclosures 4) Inferior risk/reward relative to alternatives.
Studied ASRs all share these drawbacks. That does not prevent some from being profitable. Profitability depends on post deal stock performance rather than liability exposure, governance quality, or disclosure transparency. Still, regardless of profitability, ASRs are found to provide lower returns compared to simpler and/or less risky alternatives. So, why have ASRs grown in popularity in recent years? Other than sympathetic accounting, no satisfactory explanation is found or hypothesized.
HP's ASR reinforces the view that cosmetic accounting rather than economics attracts companies to ASRs. In published interviews, HP managers explain their goal: A deal to smoothly offset anticipated options dilution without incurring a reported profit, loss or fee. HP's ASR achieves that goal. Like other ASRs, HP's requires no income statement recognition. Absent any income accounting, HP's banker and counterparty, BNP Paribas, is free to report that HP "probably saved over $100 million." However, we calculate, to the contrary, that the $1.7 billion transaction costs HP and its ongoing shareholders at least $115 million (6.7%) while exposing HP to unnecessary liability.
Whether ASRs facilitate efficient execution of large buybacks with superior governance may be an open question. Arguably, equity accounting for options and buybacks should be revisited. But, as ASRs become a larger proportion of total buybacks, the need for better disclosure seems a modest, reasonable and necessary start.
Keywords: Accelerated stock repurchase, ASR, stock buyback, stock repurchase, share repurchase, VWAP, variable share, 10b5-1, 10b5 1, 10b-18, 10b 18, capital structure, dividend, Hewlett-Packard, HP,HPQ,Cypress, Cypress Semiconductor, CY, Applied Materials, AMAT, Xilinx, XLNX, Linear Technology, LLTC, payout
JEL Classification: G13, G24, G30, G32, G34, G35, M41, M45
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Disappearing Dividends: Changing Firm Characteristics or Lower Propensity to Pay?
By Eugene F. Fama and Kenneth R. French
-
Dividends, Share Repurchases, and the Substitution Hypothesis
By Gustavo Grullon and Roni Michaely
-
Payout Policy in the 21st Century
By Alon Brav, John R. Graham, ...
-
Payout Policy in the 21st Century
By Alon Brav, Campbell R. Harvey, ...
-
Financial Flexibility and the Choice between Dividends and Stock Repurchases
By Clifford P. Stephens, Murali Jagannathan, ...
-
By Roni Michaely and Franklin Allen
-
By Joan Farre-mensa, Roni Michaely, ...
-
Payout Policy in the 21th Century: The Data
By Alon Brav, Campbell R. Harvey, ...
-
A Catering Theory of Dividends
By Malcolm P. Baker and Jeffrey Wurgler
-
A Catering Theory of Dividends
By Malcolm P. Baker and Jeffrey Wurgler