Moral Rights: Diagnosis and Rehabilitation

35 Pages Posted: 28 Nov 2007

See all articles by Robert C. Bird

Robert C. Bird

University of Connecticut - School of Business; University of Connecticut School of Law

Date Written: November 27, 2007

Abstract

The United States offers some of the strongest intellectual property laws in the world. Why then does U.S. law grant such weak moral rights protection? The answer is not simply political apathy. Rather, it stems from a long-standing perception that moral rights conflict with fundamental American cultural, historical, and legal traditions.

The first part of this manuscript presents a brief history of moral rights law. The next part examines the varying forces that have contributed to the poor reception of moral rights in the United States. After an examination of the limited protection of the Visual Artists Rights Act, the paper shows that moral rights are more compatible with American socio-legal theory than currently believed. This article concludes that the more harmoniously moral rights are viewed, the more likely courts will interpret them less restrictively and Congress will offer less resistance to expanding moral rights protections.

Keywords: intellectual property, copyright, moral rights

JEL Classification: O34

Suggested Citation

Bird, Robert C., Moral Rights: Diagnosis and Rehabilitation (November 27, 2007). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1033021 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1033021

Robert C. Bird (Contact Author)

University of Connecticut - School of Business ( email )

368 Fairfield Road
Storrs, CT 06269-2041
United States

HOME PAGE: http://businesslaw.business.uconn.edu/robert-bird/

University of Connecticut School of Law ( email )

55 Elizabeth Street
Hartford, CT 06105
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
525
Abstract Views
2,771
Rank
98,781
PlumX Metrics