Assessing the Power and the Size of the Event Study Method Through the Decades
23 Pages Posted: 10 Dec 2007
Date Written: December 2007
Abstract
The idiosyncratic risk is a key input of the standard event study method. The recent literature has suggested that the idiosyncratic risk is not stable through time, and it has increased significantly in the nineties. This paper investigates to what extent the event study method is affected by this economic phenomenon. Using both simulation and real dataset analyses, we show that the classical event study methods suffer from a significant loss of power due to increasing idiosyncratic risk, as the intuition suggests it. A (and maybe the only) solution to alleviate the impact of increasing idiosyncratic risk consists in increasing the sample size by a factor corresponding to the ratio of average idiosyncratic variances between the analyzed periods.
Keywords: event study, idiosyncratic risk
JEL Classification: G14, G34
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
New Evidence and Perspectives on Mergers
By Gregor Andrade, Mark L. Mitchell, ...
-
Do Managerial Objectives Drive Bad Acquisitions?
By Randall Morck, Andrei Shleifer, ...
-
Stock Market Driven Acquisitions
By Andrei Shleifer and Robert W. Vishny
-
Stock Market Driven Acquisitions
By Andrei Shleifer and Robert W. Vishny
-
Poison or Placebo? Evidence on the Deterrent and Wealth Effects of Modern Antitakeover Measures
By Robert Comment and G. William Schwert
-
Does Corporate Performance Improve after Mergers?
By Paul M. Healy, Krishna Palepu, ...
-
Managerial Performance, Tobin's Q, and the Gains from Successful Tender Offers
By Larry H.p. Lang, Ralph A. Walkling, ...