Extremism and Social Learning
64 Pages Posted: 21 Dec 2007 Last revised: 26 Nov 2022
There are 4 versions of this paper
Extremism and Social Learning
Extremism and Social Learning
Extremism and Social Learning
Date Written: December 2007
Abstract
When members of deliberating groups speak with one another, their predeliberation tendencies often become exacerbated as their views become more extreme. The resulting phenomenon -- group polarization -- has been observed in many settings, and it bears on the actions of juries, administrative tribunals, corporate boards, and other institutions. Polarization can result from rational Bayesian updating by group members, but in many contexts, this rational interpretation of polarization seems implausible. We argue that people are better seen as Credulous Bayesians, who insufficiently adjust for idiosyncratic features of particular environments and put excessive weight on the statements of others where there are 1) common sources of information; 2) highly unrepresentative group membership; 3) statements that are made to obtain approval; and 4) statements that are designed to manipulate. Credulous Bayesianism can produce extremism and significant blunders. We discuss the implications of Credulous Bayesianism for law and politics, including media policy and cognitive diversity on administrative agencies and courts.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
By Simeon Djankov, Caralee Mcliesh, ...
-
By Simeon Djankov, Caralee Mcliesh, ...
-
The Political Economy of Government Responsiveness: Theory and Evidence from India
By Timothy J. Besley and Robin Burgess
-
Handcuffs for the Grabbing Hand? Media Capture and Government Accountability
By Timothy J. Besley and Andrea Prat
-
Handcuffs for the Grabbing Hand? Media Capture and Government Accountability
By Timothy J. Besley and Andrea Prat
-
By Matthew Gentzkow and Jesse M. Shapiro
-
By Matthew Gentzkow and Jesse M. Shapiro