A Consensus on Second Stage Analyses in Ecological Inference Models
Political Analysis, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 86-94, Winter 2003
9 Pages Posted: 13 Jan 2008
Abstract
Since Herron and Shotts (2003a; hereinafter HS), Adolph and King (2003; hereinafter AK), and Herron and Shotts (2003b; hereinafter HS2), the four of us have iterated many more times, learned a great deal, and arrived at a consensus on this issue. This paper describes our joint recommendations for how to run second-stage ecological regressions, and provides detailed analyses to back up our claims.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Did Illegally Counted Overseas Absentee Ballots Decide the 2000 U.S. Presidential Election?
By Kosuke Imai and Gary King
-
Analyzing Second Stage Ecological Regressions: Comment on Herron and Shotts
By Christopher Adolph and Gary King
-
The Future of Ecological Inference Research: A Reply to Freedman Et Al
By Gary King