How Not to Lie with Statistics: Avoiding Common Mistakes in Quantitative Political Science
American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 666-687, August 1986
22 Pages Posted: 17 Jan 2008
Abstract
This article identifies a set of serious theoretical mistakes appearing with troublingly high frequency throughout the quantitative political science literature. These mistakes are all based on faulty statistical theory or on erroneous statistical analysis. Through algebraic and interpretive proofs, some of the most commonly made mistakes are explicated and illustrated. The theoretical problem underlying each is highlighted, and suggested solutions are provided throughout. It is argued that closer attention to these problems and solutions will result in more reliable quantitative analyses and more useful theoretical contributions.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Estimating Incumbency Advantage Without Bias
By Andrew Gelman and Gary King
-
A Unified Method of Evaluating Electoral Systems and Redistricting Plans
By Andrew Gelman and Gary King
-
Systemic Consequences of Incumbency Advantage in the U.S. House
By Gary King and Andrew Gelman
-
Representation Through Legislative Redistricting: A Stochastic Model
By Gary King
-
Democratic Representation and Partisan Bias in Congressional Elections
By Gary King and Robert X. Browning
-
Enhancing Democracy Through Legislative Redistricting
By Andrew Gelman and Gary King
-
'Truth' is Stranger than Prediction, More Questionable than Causal Inference
By Gary King
-
Political Parties and Foreign Policy: A Structure Approach
By Gary King
-
Estimating the Electoral Consequences of Legislative Redistricting
By Andrew Gelman and Gary King
-
Constituency Service and Incumbency Advantage
By Gary King