Portfolio Credit Risk: Top-Down vs. Bottom-Up Approaches
17 Pages Posted: 17 Feb 2008
Date Written: January 1, 2008
Abstract
Dynamic reduced form models of portfolio credit risk can be distinguished by the way in which the intensity of the default process is specified. In a bottom up model, the portfolio intensity is an aggregate of the constituent intensities. In a top down model, the portfolio intensity is specified without reference to the constituents. This expository article contrasts these modeling approaches. It emphasizes the role of the information filtration as a modeling tool.
Keywords: Portfolio credit risk, intensity, filtration, point process, credit derivative
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
A Top-Down Approach to Multi-Name Credit
By Kay Giesecke, Lisa R. Goldberg, ...
-
Calibration of CDO Tranches with the Dynamical Generalized-Poisson Loss Model
By Damiano Brigo, Andrea Pallavicini, ...
-
Time-Changed Birth Processes and Multi-Name Credit Derivatives
By Kay Giesecke, Xiaowei Ding, ...
-
Affine Point Processes and Portfolio Credit Risk
By Eymen Errais, Kay Giesecke, ...
-
Semi-Analytical Valuation of Basket Credit Derivatives in Intensity-Based Models
-
Risk Neutral Versus Objective Loss Distribution and CDO Tranches Valuation
By Roberto Torresetti, Damiano Brigo, ...
-
Estimating Tranche Spreads by Loss Process Simulation
By Baeho Kim and Kay Giesecke
-
Implied Expected Tranched Loss Surface from CDO Data
By Roberto Torresetti, Damiano Brigo, ...
-
Multiscale Intensity Models and Name Grouping for Valuation of Multi-Name Credit Derivatives
By Evan Papageorgiou and Ronnie Sircar