Sanctioning Law Firms for Lawyers' Frivolous Filings

Illinois Bar Journal, Vol. 95, p. 490, 2007

Posted: 21 Feb 2008

See all articles by Jeffrey A. Parness

Jeffrey A. Parness

Northern Illinois University - College of Law

Date Written: February 20, 2008

Abstract

In Medical Alliances, LLC v. Health Care Service Corp., 863 N.E.2d 1169 (Ill. App. 2d 2007), the court ruled that a law firm could not be sanctioned under Illinois Supreme Court Rule 137 for the filing of a frivolous pleading by a law firm member. The split among Illinois appellate courts on the issue continues. Unlike Rule 137, law firms can definitely be sanctioned under Federal Civil Procedure Rule11. Illinois judicial rulemakers should now allow law firm sanctions thorugh amendments to Rule 137, itself added and modeled in 1989 on the 1983 amendments to Rule 11. In the absence of Rule 187 authority, inherent sanctioning power is available against law firms for pleading and other civil litigation misconduct in the Illinois circuit courts.

Keywords: Rule 11, Rule 137, law firm sanctions, civil procedure, frivolous pleading

Suggested Citation

Parness, Jeffrey A., Sanctioning Law Firms for Lawyers' Frivolous Filings (February 20, 2008). Illinois Bar Journal, Vol. 95, p. 490, 2007, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1095838

Jeffrey A. Parness (Contact Author)

Northern Illinois University - College of Law ( email )

Swen Parson Hall
DeKalb, IL 60115
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
56
Abstract Views
1,259
Rank
132,583
PlumX Metrics