The Returns to Spring-Loading
46 Pages Posted: 9 Mar 2008 Last revised: 21 Apr 2009
Date Written: March 2009
Abstract
Abnormal returns following public disclosures of unscheduled grants to CEOs are positive and highly significant in the post Sarbanes Oxley period. This implies widespread spring-loading (awarding options ahead of good news releases). Between September 2002 and March 2006, a trading strategy that buys stocks after news of unscheduled option grants to CEOs become public earns 1.1% monthly abnormal returns, implying the market did not realize that grants were spring-loaded. After March 2006, when it was no longer possible to spring-load grants in a clandestine fashion, this practice stopped. This suggests spring-loading was a means of providing secret compensation rather than prudent pay practice.
Keywords: Executive stock options, Executive compensation, Corporate Governance, Sarbanes Oxley Act, Backdating
JEL Classification: J33, M52, G34, G38, K42
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Are CEOS Really Paid Like Bureaucrats?
By Brian J. Hall and Jeffrey B. Liebman
-
Are CEOS Really Paid Like Bureaucrats?
By Brian J. Hall and Jeffrey B. Liebman
-
The Other Side of the Tradeoff: The Impact of Risk on Executive Compensation
-
Good Timing: CEO Stock Option Awards and Company News Announcements
-
Good Timing: CEO Stock Option Awards and Company News Announcements
-
The Use of Equity Grants to Manage Optimal Equity Incentive Levels
By John E. Core and Wayne R. Guay
-
The Other Side of the Tradeoff: the Impact of Risk on Executive Compensation
-
Stock Options for Undiversified Executives
By Brian J. Hall and Kevin J. Murphy