Does Distance between Target and Acquirer Matter for Bank Mergers?
35 Pages Posted: 24 Mar 2008
Date Written: March 2007
Abstract
Geographical deregulation in the 1980s and 1990s led to a wave of US bank mergers. A still unresolved issue is the role that distance between target and acquirer plays in the performance and efficiency of mergers. In theory, a nearby bank acquisition reduces monitoring costs while a distant acquisition achieves greater risk diversification. By analyzing the efficiency and performance of more than one thousand bank mergers between 1988 and 2002, we find that distance improved bank performance for mergers within a given BHC. In contrast, distance led to a decline in profitability and an increase in risk for mergers of banks from different BHCs. We argue that the BHC structure enables a firm to establish effective monitoring capabilities before consolidating, which allows the BHC to manage far-flung enterprises effectively.
Keywords: bank mergers, bank performance, geographic diversification
JEL Classification: G1, G2
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Relationship Lending and Lines of Credit in Small Firm Finance
By Allen N. Berger and Gregory F. Udell
-
Lines of Credit and Relationship Lending in Small Firm Finance
By Allen N. Berger and Gregory F. Udell
-
Information Production and Capital Allocation: Decentralized vs. Hierarchical Firms
-
Information Production and Capital Allocation: Decentralized vs. Hierarchical Firms
-
Does Distance Still Matter? The Information Revolution in Small Business Lending
-
Does Distance Still Matter? The Information Revolution in Small Business Lending
-
By Allen N. Berger, Philip E. Strahan, ...
-
By Allen N. Berger, Nathan Miller, ...
-
By Allen N. Berger, Nathan Miller, ...
-
By Allen N. Berger and Gregory F. Udell