Development-Related Biases in Factor Productivities and the HOV Model of Trade
43 Pages Posted: 19 Mar 2008
Date Written: March 2008
Abstract
Past empirical failures of the basic Heckscher-Ohlin-Vanek (HOV) model related to the inability of data to meet its restrictive assumptions, particularly identical international technologies and factor price equalization. Trefler (1993) tried to resuscitate HOV by introducing a simple Hicks-neutral (HN) factor-productivity adjustment, an approach that was heavily criticized. In this paper, we re-examine the productivity question by estimating factor-specific productivities from the individual technology data of multiple countries. Using a dataset of 29 countries, both developed and developing, we find evidence of factor-augmenting technological differences. In particular, the factor-productivity adjustment works well for developed members of the OECD. Further, we find that the ratios of factor productivities are strongly correlated with corresponding factor endowments. This systematic bias implies that the ability of HOV to explain North-South factor trade depends both on relative factor abundance and factor-augmenting productivity gaps.
Keywords: Heckscher-Ohlin-Vanek, factor trade, productivity
JEL Classification: F10, F11
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Technology, Factor Supplies and International Specialization: Estimating the Neoclassical Model
-
Do Endowments Predict the Location of Production? Evidence from National and International Data
-
One Size Fits All? Heckscher-Ohlin Specialization in Global Production
-
The Heckscher-Ohlin-Vanek Model of Trade: Why Does it Fail? When Does it Work?
By Donald R. Davis, David E. Weinstein, ...
-
Increasing Returns and All that: A View from Trade
By Werner Antweiler and Daniel Trefler
-
Estimation of Cross-Country Differences in Industry Production Functions
-
Specialization and the Volume of Trade: Do the Data Obey the Laws?