Accidents, Liability Obligations and Monopolized Markets for Spare Parts: Profits and Social Welfare
25 Pages Posted: 6 May 2008
Date Written: April 2008
Abstract
We analyze the effects of accidents and liability obligations on the incentives of car manufacturers to monopolize the markets for their spare parts. We show that monopolized markets for spare parts lead to higher overall expenditures for consumers. Furthermore, while the manufacturers invest more in order to offer cars with higher qualities, monopolization tends to reduce social welfare. Key for these results is the observation that high prices for spare parts entail a negative external effect inasmuch as liability obligations imply that consumers of competing products have to pay the high prices as well.
Keywords: aftermarkets, monopolization, liability
JEL Classification: L13, L42, D43
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Competition, Monopoly, and Aftermarkets
By Dennis W. Carlton and Michael Waldman
-
Competition, Monopoly and Aftermarkets
By Michael Waldman and Dennis W. Carlton
-
By Dennis W. Carlton and Michael Waldman