The Story of Reynolds v. United States: Federal 'Hell Hounds' Punishing Mormon Treason

FAMILY LAW STORIES, Chapter 3, pp. 51-75, Carol Sanger, ed., Foundation Press, 2008. With permission of Thomson Reuters/West.

U of Maryland Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2008-5

26 Pages Posted: 11 Mar 2008 Last revised: 21 May 2008

See all articles by Martha M. Ertman

Martha M. Ertman

University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law

Abstract

Part of the Law Stories series published by Foundation Press, this chapter in Family Law Stories tells the back story of the 1878 US Supreme Court case Reynolds v. U.S.. While the case held that Mormon polygamy was not protected as the free exercise of religion, this chapter shifts our focus away from sex and religion and toward the Court's language linking Mormon polygamy with Asiatic and African peoples as well as political despotism. This close examination of the historical record shows that 19th century concerns about Mormon separatism - commercial, social and political separatism as well was religious - were as important, or even more so, than plural marriage itself. To make its case that antipollygamists of the day viewed Mormon polygamy as both politically and culturally treasonous, the chapter describes George Reynolds' career, marriages, and imprisonment, including how his life-long devotion to the Mormon Church led to him to be the defendant in this test case. In conclusion, this chapter suggests that Reynolds' reliance on political claims of treason (as well as white supremacist views of Mormon polygamy as race treason) may limit the precedential value of the case. In particular, if Reynolds is really about Mormon's treasonous establishment of a separatist theocracy, it has little applicability to current discussions of same sex marriage since same sex marriage is an assimilationist project.

Keywords: polygamy, political separatism, treason

Suggested Citation

Ertman, Martha M., The Story of Reynolds v. United States: Federal 'Hell Hounds' Punishing Mormon Treason. FAMILY LAW STORIES, Chapter 3, pp. 51-75, Carol Sanger, ed., Foundation Press, 2008. With permission of Thomson Reuters/West., U of Maryland Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2008-5, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1135610

Martha M. Ertman (Contact Author)

University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law ( email )

500 West Baltimore Street
Baltimore, MD 21201-1786
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
138
Abstract Views
1,103
Rank
376,949
PlumX Metrics