Objective Versus Subjective Justification: A Case Study in Function and Form in Constructing a System of Criminal Law Theory

CRIMINAL LAW CONVERSATIONS, Robinson, Garvey & Ferzan, eds., pp. 343-53, 361-63, 2009

U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 08-23

14 Pages Posted: 7 Jun 2008 Last revised: 21 Jul 2009

See all articles by Paul H. Robinson

Paul H. Robinson

University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School

Abstract

This short essay, part of the Criminal Law Conversations project, argues for an objective formulation of justification defenses, in which an actor's conduct is justified if it adheres to the objective rule of conduct that we want people to follow in the future. That is, it argues that justification defenses serve an essential function in announcing the rules of conduct ex ante to state the authorized exceptions to the law's prohibitions. The essay is critical of a subjective formulation of justification defenses, in which an actor is said to be "justified" if she reasonably believes she is justified even if her conduct is not something we would want others to do in the future. The objective formulation is preferable both because it serves better to define ex ante the criminal law's rule of conduct, including the exceptions to its prohibitions, and because it produces the correct liability results with regard to the unknowingly justified actor and those who resist and assist him.

Keywords: justification defenses, objective rule of conduct, ex ante, subjective formulation of justification, subjectivity, objectivity

Suggested Citation

Robinson, Paul H., Objective Versus Subjective Justification: A Case Study in Function and Form in Constructing a System of Criminal Law Theory. CRIMINAL LAW CONVERSATIONS, Robinson, Garvey & Ferzan, eds., pp. 343-53, 361-63, 2009, U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 08-23, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1141982

Paul H. Robinson (Contact Author)

University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School ( email )

3501 Sansom Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
387
Abstract Views
6,967
Rank
140,356
PlumX Metrics