Is There an Expressive Function of Law? An Empirical Analysis of Voting Laws with Symbolic Fines

Posted: 16 Jun 2008

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: Spring 2007

Abstract

This article empirically investigates whether law affects behavior beyond deterrence (expressive function of law). With Swiss panel data, I find that the legal abolition of the voting duty significantly decreased average turnout, even though the fines for not voting have only been symbolic. As for the size of Cantonal turnout reduction, it widely differs between the Cantons and is highly correlated with voter participation before the removal of the voting duty. In contrast to the voting duty, the introduction of postal voting did not affect voter turnout in spite of the substantial decrease in transaction costs. Therefore, in public good areas such as voting, even a sanctionless law targeting at the civic duty might have a bigger impact on behavior than actions which affect the costs of provision for the public good.

Keywords: K00, H00

Suggested Citation

Funk, Patricia, Is There an Expressive Function of Law? An Empirical Analysis of Voting Laws with Symbolic Fines (Spring 2007). American Law and Economics Review, Vol. 9, Issue 1, pp. 135-159, 2007, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1145984 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aler/ahm002

Patricia Funk (Contact Author)

University of Lugano ( email )

Via Giuseppe Buffi 13
Lugano, TN Ticino 6900
Switzerland

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
724
PlumX Metrics