The Supreme Court of Canada and the Right to Bargain Collectively: The Implications of the Health Services and Support Case in Canada and Beyond

Posted: 22 Jun 2008

See all articles by Judy Fudge

Judy Fudge

Kent Law School; University of California, Berkeley - Berkeley Center on Comparative Equality & Anti-Discrimination Law

Date Written: March 2008

Abstract

In June 2007, the Supreme Court of Canada expressly overruled 20 years of jurisprudence that interpreted the freedom of association as excluding collective bargaining. This about-face by the Supreme Court was unexpected. What gave rise to this remarkable decision and what does it portend for the role of the courts in labour relations in Canada and beyond? The recent successes before courts have led some observers to suggest that it may now be a propitious time for a coordinated and proactive litigation strategy to vindicate labour's collective rights. This article offers some preliminary answers to these broader questions and issues by focussing on the Supreme Court's decision in the Health Services and Support case.

Suggested Citation

Fudge, Judy, The Supreme Court of Canada and the Right to Bargain Collectively: The Implications of the Health Services and Support Case in Canada and Beyond (March 2008). Industrial Law Journal, Vol. 37, Issue 1, pp. 25-48, 2008, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1149591 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwm038

Judy Fudge (Contact Author)

Kent Law School ( email )

Keynes College
Canterbury, Kent CT2 7NP
United Kingdom

University of California, Berkeley - Berkeley Center on Comparative Equality & Anti-Discrimination Law

Boalt Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720-7200
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
667
PlumX Metrics