Positional Issues, Valence Issues and the Economic Geography of Voting in British Elections

Posted: 7 Jul 2008

Date Written: January 2008

Abstract

A body of research has built up in recent years linking the changing geography of party support in British elections to variations in the country's economic geography. Consistent with the economic vote model, government support has been shown to be higher than average in affluent areas and lower than average in poorer areas. However, the great majority of such studies have concentrated on elections between 1979 and 1997, a prolonged period of one-party rule. This article argues that this means existing research cannot differentiate between the very different predictions of positional and valence approaches to economic voting since both suggest identical outcomes during Conservative administrations. By contrasting a period of Conservative rule with a period of Labour rule, however, the article provides a test of the competing claims of the positional and valence arguments for an understanding of Britain's electoral geography.

Keywords: economic voting, valence politics, electoral geography

JEL Classification: D72

Suggested Citation

Pattie, Charles, Positional Issues, Valence Issues and the Economic Geography of Voting in British Elections (January 2008). Journal of Economic Geography, Vol. 8, Issue 1, pp. 105-126, 2008, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1155890 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbm032

Charles Pattie (Contact Author)

University of Sheffield ( email )

17 Mappin Street
Sheffield, Sheffield S1 4DT
United Kingdom

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
619
PlumX Metrics