Punitive Damages Revisited: Taking the Rationale for Non-Recognition of Foreign Judgments Too Far

16 Pages Posted: 10 Aug 2008

See all articles by Ronald A. Brand

Ronald A. Brand

University of Pittsburgh - School of Law

Date Written: August 9, 2008

Abstract

Punitive damages have been a controversial aspect of U.S. law; often criticized both at home and abroad. Neither U.S. law on punitive damages nor the foreign climate regarding their reception has remained static. This article notes the continuing legislative attack on punitive damages in the United States at both the state and federal level, and focuses on recent developments in case law and treaty negotiations concerning the reception of punitive damages abroad.

The article begins with a brief review of the background against which current punitive damages law in the United States continues to operate, followed by consideration of the continuing evolution of U.S. Supreme Court jurisprudence on punitive damages. The Beals case in the Supreme Court of Canada and new uniform Canadian legislation on the enforcement of foreign judgments demonstrate two very different approaches to U.S. punitive damages by foreign courts. The issue is also the focus of Article 11 of the new Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements, which offers a much more moderate approach than the Canadian uniform act, which, if widely adopted, would constitute a major step back in terms of predictability in business and judicial relationships.

Keywords: punitive damages, jurisdiction, conflict of laws, Hague Convention on Exclusive Choice of Court Agreements, recognition of judgments, enforcement, exemplary damages

Suggested Citation

Brand, Ronald A., Punitive Damages Revisited: Taking the Rationale for Non-Recognition of Foreign Judgments Too Far (August 9, 2008). Journal of Law and Commerce, Vol. 25, p. 181-196, 2005, U. of Pittsburgh Legal Studies Research Paper Series, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1214206

Ronald A. Brand (Contact Author)

University of Pittsburgh - School of Law ( email )

3900 Forbes Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA 15260
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
235
Abstract Views
2,064
Rank
236,407
PlumX Metrics