Sweetening the Pill: A Theory of Waiting To Merge

Journal of Industry Competition and Trade, vol 19, pp 351-388, 2019.

44 Pages Posted: 18 Aug 2008 Last revised: 8 Apr 2020

See all articles by Eileen Fumagalli

Eileen Fumagalli

Konkurransetilsynet

Tore Nilssen

University of Oslo - Department of Economics

Date Written: May 20, 2019

Abstract

Merger policy is a permission-granting activity by government in which there may be disincentives to seek permission because of the benefit from having other firms merge. We set up a sequential merger game with endogenized antitrust policy to study one aspect of these disincentives. In particular, we delineate a pill-sweetening motive for waiting to merge: a small firm may choose to let other bigger firms move first, in order to get more mergers approved by government. We report the prevalence of pill sweetening to occur in equilibrium and find it to hinge on efficiency gains from a merger, differently-sized firms, firms' production technology, the presence of an antitrust authority, the alignment of interests between antitrust authorities and firms, and the number of firms in the industry.

Keywords: Mergers, Antitrust Policy

JEL Classification: L11, L13, L41, G34

Suggested Citation

Fumagalli, Eileen and Nilssen, Tore, Sweetening the Pill: A Theory of Waiting To Merge (May 20, 2019). Journal of Industry Competition and Trade, vol 19, pp 351-388, 2019., Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1233503 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1233503

Eileen Fumagalli

Konkurransetilsynet ( email )

P.O. Box 439 Sentrum
NO- 5805 Bergen
Norway
+47 55 59 75 33 (Phone)

Tore Nilssen (Contact Author)

University of Oslo - Department of Economics ( email )

P.O. Box 1095 Blindern
N-0317 Oslo
Norway

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
153
Abstract Views
1,222
Rank
349,994
PlumX Metrics