Overcoming Dred: A Counterfactual Analysis

Constitutional Commentary, Vol. 24, pp. 733-770, 2007

37 Pages Posted: 17 Sep 2008 Last revised: 1 Oct 2014

Date Written: September 17, 2008

Abstract

This article asks the question whether Dred Scott could have been overruled in its own time, under then-existing constitutional understandings. If so, the core constitutional infirmity of Dred Scott would be uncovered, apart from those discussed in the usual critiques of the case. Employing a counterfactual hypothesis of a Chase Court with a Lincoln-appointed majority coming into being in the early 1860s and eager to overrule Dred Scott, three possible constitutional challenges to Dred Scott are explored and the third is found reasonably potent and convincing. But obstacles to its deployment are also seen, and anomalies and ironies that would accompany any such overruling of Dred Scott are identified.

Keywords: Dred Scott, Lincoln, Sandford

Suggested Citation

Weinberg, Louise, Overcoming Dred: A Counterfactual Analysis (September 17, 2008). Constitutional Commentary, Vol. 24, pp. 733-770, 2007 , Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1269392

Louise Weinberg (Contact Author)

University of Texas at Austin ( email )

2317 Speedway
Austin, TX Texas 78712
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
92
Abstract Views
688
Rank
506,276
PlumX Metrics