Voting for Mobile Citizens
MAGKS Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics No. 17-2008
23 Pages Posted: 6 Oct 2008
Date Written: September 1, 2008
Abstract
This paper analyzes inter- and intraregional redistribution in a centralized state using the citizen-candidate model. It focuses on conflicting interests among regions and among citizens of varying mobility. If discrimination with respect to place of residence and degree of mobility is possible, diversity of interests is high. Under the plurality rule and with sincere voting, the largest socioeconomic group of citizens supplies the winning candidate and discriminates against all other groups. However, if discrimination with respect to the degree of mobility is constrained, mobile citizens may gain power and interregional redistribution is reduced.
JEL Classification: D7, H1
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Decentralization and Corruption: Evidence Across Countries
By Raymond J. Fisman and Roberta Gatti
-
Corruption and the Rate of Temptation: Do Low Wages in the Civil Service Cause Corruption?
-
Does Decentralization Increase Responsiveness to Local Needs? Evidence from Bolivia
-
Applying a Simple Measure of Good Governance to the Debate on Fiscal Decentralization
By Anwar Shah and Jeffrey Huther
-
An International Statistical Survey of Government Employment and Wages
By Salvatore Schiavo-campo, Giulio De Tommaso, ...
-
Does Decentralization Increase Government Responsiveness to Local Needs? Evidence from Bolivia
-
Distributive Politics and the Benefits of Decentralisation
By Ben Lockwood
-
Fiscal Decentralization and Governance: A Cross-Country Analysis
-
Fiscal Federalism and Macroeconomic Governance: For Better or for Worse?
By Anwar Shah