Subjective Performance Evaluation and Inequality Aversion
32 Pages Posted: 3 Nov 2008
Abstract
Many firms use subjective performance appraisal systems due to lack of objective performance measures. In these cases, supervisors usually have to rate the performance of their subordinates. Using such systems, it is a well established fact that many supervisors tend to assess the employees too good (leniency bias) and that the appraisals hardly vary across employees of a certain supervisor (centrality bias). We explain these two biases in a model with a supervisor, who has preferences for the utility of her inequality averse subordinates, and discuss determinants of the size of the biases. Extensions of the basic model include the role of supervisor's favoritism of one particular agent and the endogenous effort choice of agents. Whether inequality averse agents exert higher efforts then purely self-oriented ones, depends on the size of effort costs and inequality aversion.
Keywords: appraisals, inequality aversion, performance evaluation, centrality bias, leniency bias
JEL Classification: M5, D63
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Moral Hazard and Other-Regarding Preferences
By Hideshi Itoh
-
Envy and Compassion in Tournaments
By Christian Grund and Dirk Sliwka
-
Contracts and Inequity Aversion
By Florian Englmaier and Achim Wambach
-
Optimal Incentive Contracts Under Inequity Aversion
By Florian Englmaier and Achim Wambach
-
The Intensity of Incentives in Firms and Markets: Moral Hazard With Envious Agents
-
Optimal Incentive Contracts for a Worker Who Envies His Boss
By Robert Dur and Amihai Glazer
-
Output and Wages with Inequality Averse Agents
By Dominique Demougin, Claude Fluet, ...
-
Inequity Aversion in Tournaments
By Dominique Demougin and Claude Fluet
-
Optimal Contracts When Agents Envy Each Other
By Anjan V. Thakor and Anand M. Goel