Are All Labor Regulations Equal? Evidence from Indian Manufacturing

54 Pages Posted: 3 Nov 2008

See all articles by Ahmad Ahsan

Ahmad Ahsan

World Bank

Carmen Pages

Inter-American Development Bank (IADB); IZA Institute of Labor Economics

Abstract

Using manufacturing data for India, this paper studies the economic effects of legal amendments on two types of labor laws: employment protection and labor dispute resolution legislation. We find that laws that increase employment protection or the cost of labor disputes substantially reduce registered sector employment and output. These laws do no seem to benefit workers either, as they do not increase the share of value added that goes to labor. Labor-intensive industries, such as textiles, are the hardest hit by amendments that increase employment protection while capital-intensive industries are the most affected by laws that increase the cost of labor dispute resolution. These adverse effects are not alleviated by the widespread and increasing use of contract labor, particularly in regards to employment. Results are robust to an alternative codification of legal amendments suggested by Bhattacharjea (2006).

Keywords: employment protection, labor dispute resolution, contract labor, employment, India

JEL Classification: J23, J52, K31

Suggested Citation

Ahsan, Ahmad and Pages-Serra, Carmen, Are All Labor Regulations Equal? Evidence from Indian Manufacturing. IZA Discussion Paper No. 3394, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1294538 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1294538

Ahmad Ahsan (Contact Author)

World Bank ( email )

1818 H Street, NW
Washington, DC 20433
United States

Carmen Pages-Serra

Inter-American Development Bank (IADB) ( email )

1300 New York Avenue, NW
Research Department
Washington, DC 20577
United States
202-623 3110 (Phone)
202-623-2481 (Fax)

IZA Institute of Labor Economics

Schaumburg-Lippe-Str. 7 / 9
Bonn, D-53072
Germany

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
189
Abstract Views
2,070
Rank
291,687
PlumX Metrics