No-Arbitrage Option Pricing: New Evidence on the Validity of the Martingale Property
42 Pages Posted: 7 Nov 2008
Date Written: June 1997
Abstract
The no-arbitrage approach to option pricing implies that risk-neutral prices follow a martingale. The validity of this property has been tested and rejected by Longstaff (1995). Since he tested the general framework, his results have far reaching and disturbing implications for contingent claims pricing. This paper proposes a new method to test the martingale property. This method is based on the Laguerre polynomial series. The tests use options and futures on the S&P 500 index. The new methodology and data show that the martingale property cannot be rejected. This result implies that the general approach is still valid and the existence of frictions only adds noise. Testing more specific pricing models is relevant again.
Keywords: Option Pricing, Martingale Pricing, Semi-Nonparametric Method
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Transform Analysis and Asset Pricing for Affine Jump-Diffusions
By Darrell Duffie, Jun Pan, ...
-
Transform Analysis and Asset Pricing for Affine Jump-Diffusions
By Darrell Duffie, Jun Pan, ...
-
The Impact of Jumps in Volatility and Returns
By Michael S. Johannes, Bjorn Eraker, ...
-
Implied Volatility Functions: Empirical Tests
By Bernard Dumas, Jeff Fleming, ...
-
Recovering Risk Aversion from Option Prices and Realized Returns
-
Recovering Probabilities and Risk Aversion from Option Prices and Realized Returns
-
Stock Return Characteristics, Skew Laws, and the Differential Pricing of Individual Equity Options
By Gurdip Bakshi, Nikunj Kapadia, ...
-
Stock Return Characteristics, Skew Laws, and the Differential Pricing of Individual Equity Options
By Nikunj Kapadia, Gurdip Bakshi, ...
-
Nonparametric Estimation of State-Price Densities Implicit in Financial Asset Prices
By Yacine Ait-sahalia and Andrew W. Lo