The Interpretation of 'Likely' Depends on the Context, But 70% is 70% - Right? The Influence of Associative Processes on Perceived Certainty
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, Vol. 25, No. 6, pp. 1514-1533, 1999
20 Pages Posted: 23 Nov 2008
Date Written: 1999
Abstract
Past research has demonstrated that interpretations of vague verbal forecasts (e.g., "likely") differ as a function of the context to which they refer. Experiments 1 and 2 demonstrate that precise numeric forecasts (e.g., "70%") are also susceptible to such context effects. Participants read descriptions of target events and experts' numeric forecasts. Perceptions of certainty, expressed on nonnumeric scales, differed as a function of context manipulations. The results of Experiments 3a, 3b, and 4 indicate that these effects can be mediated by perceptions of an event's representativeness independently of subjective base rates. The results are also consistent with the idea that two types of semi-independent processing-associative and rule based-can have important influences on perceptions of certainty. Implications of this distinction for research on judgments and decisions under uncertainty are discussed.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Decisions from Experience and the Effect of Rare Events in Risky Choice
By Ralph Hertwig, Gregory M. Barron, ...
-
The Base Rate Fallacy Reconsidered: Normative, Descriptive and Methodological Challenges
-
Determinants of Diagnostic Hypothesis Generation: Effects of Information, Base Rates, and Experience
By Elke U. Weber, Ulf Bockenholt, ...