Public Goods, Participation Constraints, and Democracy: A Possibility Theorem
29 Pages Posted: 18 Dec 2008
Date Written: December 2008
Abstract
It is well known that ex post efficient mechanisms for the provision of indivisible public goods are not interim individually rational. However, the corresponding literature assumes that agents who veto a mechanism can enforce a situation in which the public good is never provided. This paper instead considers majority voting with uniform cost sharing as the relevant status quo. Efficient mechanisms may then exist, which also satisfy all agents' interim participation constraints. In this case, ex post inefficient voting mechanisms can be replaced by efficient ones without reducing any individual's expected utility. Intuitively, agents with a low willingness to pay have to contribute more under majority rule than under an efficient mechanism with a balanced budget. This possibility theorem is not universal in the sense of Schweizer (Games and Economic Behavior, 2005).
Keywords: Ex post efficiency, Majority voting, Participation constraints, Possibility theorem, Public goods
JEL Classification: D02, D61, D71, H41
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Efficient Mechanisms for Public Goods with Use Exclusions
By Peter Norman
-
An Efficiency Rationale for Bundling of Public Goods
By Hanming Fang and Peter Norman
-
By Hanming Fang and Peter Norman
-
Monopolistic Provision of Excludable Public Goods Under Private Information
-
Toward an Efficiency Rationale for the Public Provision of Private Goods
By Hanming Fang and Peter Norman
-
Portfolio Diversification and Value at Risk Under Thick-Tailedness
-
Optimal Provision of Multiple Excludable Public Goods
By Hanming Fang and Peter Norman
-
Optimal Provision of Multiple Excludable Public Goods
By Hanming Fang and Peter Norman
-
The Provision and Pricing of Excludable Public Goods: Ramsey-Boiteux Pricing Versus Bundling
-
A Note on Budget Balance Under Interim Participation Constraints: The Case of Independent Types
By Tilman Borgers and Peter Norman