Should We Mind the Gap? Gender Pay Differentials and Public Policy
64 Pages Posted: 11 Dec 2008
Date Written: October 21, 2008
Abstract
Differences in the earnings of women and men are increasingly being used to justify regulation of the private affairs of employers and employees. Yet there is very little evidence that the 'gender pay gap' is the result of unfair discrimination. In fact in can be explained by variations in the kinds of job undertaken by men and women, as well as educational and lifestyle choices. Women may favour quality of life and job satisfaction over higher earnings.
The authors argues that complete equality of pay is impossible to achieve in a free society of any complexity. Men and women would need to be identical in their qualifications, choice of occupations, career plans and lifestyle choices.
Thus policies that try to impose equality through tighter employment regulation are unlikely to have much impact, and such measures may damage the economic position of both men and women.
Keywords: gender pay gap, gender discrimination, equal pay, women's pay, sex discrimination, labour regulations, anti-discrimination legislation
JEL Classification: J16, J21, J24, J28, J31, J71, J78
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
The Part-Time Pay Penalty for Women in Britain
By Alan Manning and Barbara Petrongolo
-
The Part-Time Pay Penalty for Women in Britain
By Alan Manning and Barbara Petrongolo
-
Why Do Part-Time Workers Earn Less? The Role of Worker and Job Skills
-
Moving Down: Women's Part - Time Work and Occupational Change in Britain 1991-2001
By Sara Connolly and Mary Gregory
-
Back-to-Front Down-Under? Part-Time/Full-Time Wage Differentials in Australia
By Alison L. Booth and Margi Wood
-
Job Satisfaction and Family Happiness: The Part-Time Work Puzzle
By Alison L. Booth and Jan C. Van Ours