Unlocking Technology: Antitrust and Innovation

Posted: 31 Dec 2008

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: December 2008

Abstract

Technology lock-in advocates argue that governments should step in to coordinate technology adoption decisions. Due to the presence of network effects, advocates warn that consumers may fail to adopt the best technology, thus missing out on potential benefits. Even worse, consumers may split, adopting multiple technologies and thus missing out on the benefits of network effects. Due to coordination problems, consumers cannot mitigate the effects of bad technology choices and the economy becomes stuck with inferior innovations. This article demonstrates that consumer coordination solves the underlying network effects problem, thus eliminating technology lock-in. Network effects are confined at most to the information and communications technology and selected electronics industries, which have developed mechanisms for interconnection and interoperability. Firms have incentives to provide interconnection and interoperability when it is efficient to do so. Rapid technological innovation is apparent whereas technology lock-in is a rare phenomenon. Antitrust policy founded on technology lock-in arguments is misguided and is likely to damage incentives for innovation.

Suggested Citation

Spulber, Daniel F., Unlocking Technology: Antitrust and Innovation (December 2008). Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Vol. 4, Issue 4, pp. 915-966, 2008, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1318128 or http://dx.doi.org/nhn016

Daniel F. Spulber (Contact Author)

Northwestern University - Kellogg School of Management ( email )

Kellogg Global Hub
2211 Campus Dr.
Evanston, IL 60208
United States
847-491-8675 (Phone)
847-467-1777 (Fax)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
705
PlumX Metrics