Benefits and Costs of the Environment: Copenhagen Consensus 2008

Journal of Environmental Law, Vol. 20, No. 3, 2008

9 Pages Posted: 5 Jan 2009 Last revised: 14 Aug 2009

Date Written: January 5, 2009

Abstract

This paper offers a critical examination of the Copenhagen Consensus, a group of distinguished economists from around the world (including several Nobel Laureates), which, for the second time in four years, has made public its deliberations on how to tackle some of the most daunting challenges facing the world. For the 2008 discussions, the 10 challenges included air pollution, conflicts, diseases, education, global warming, malnutrition and hunger, sanitation and water, subsidies and trade barriers, terrorism, women and development. The economists were given a fictive $75 billion and asked to rank the challenges according to where the money would do the most good. This paper examines the group's findings in relation to the environmental challenges of air pollution, global warming and sanitation and water. The paper argues that the findings are not as controversial or surprising as some critics point out given the benefit/cost remit of the exercise. Instead, the Copenhagen Consensus deserves credit for raising a debate about important issues and highlighting some of the shortfalls inherent in current laws and policies addressing problems of, for instance, global warming.

Suggested Citation

Pedersen, Ole Windahl, Benefits and Costs of the Environment: Copenhagen Consensus 2008 (January 5, 2009). Journal of Environmental Law, Vol. 20, No. 3, 2008, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1323251

Ole Windahl Pedersen (Contact Author)

Aarhus University ( email )

Nordre Ringgade 1
DK-8000 Aarhus C, 8000
Denmark
8000 (Fax)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
73
Abstract Views
562
Rank
580,987
PlumX Metrics