Conflict Resolution and Sustainability Disputes: Authority and Consensus in the Shadow of Law

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND THE LAW: PEOPLE, ENVIRONMENT, CULTURE, Shi-Ling Hsu & Patrick A. Molinari, eds., pp. 21-37, Montreal: Canadian Institute for the Administration of Justice, 2008

17 Pages Posted: 1 Feb 2009 Last revised: 30 May 2014

Date Written: January 1, 2008

Abstract

Must the law of sustainable development be a different kind of law? Sustainable development law raises this question because it is directed toward a future which, being both distant and global, is particularly uncertain. This paper does not tackle this difficult question but modestly proposes some preliminary thoughts about the conflict resolution models that we know and the way in which they relate to law as it serves to connect past and future. My hypothesis is that what I will call the model of principles appears as the inevitable normative framework for sustainability disputes.

Keywords: Sustainable development, Dispute resolution, Adjudication, Legal Theory, Model of Rules, Model of Principles, Public International Law, Precedent

Suggested Citation

Gelinas, Fabien, Conflict Resolution and Sustainability Disputes: Authority and Consensus in the Shadow of Law (January 1, 2008). SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND THE LAW: PEOPLE, ENVIRONMENT, CULTURE, Shi-Ling Hsu & Patrick A. Molinari, eds., pp. 21-37, Montreal: Canadian Institute for the Administration of Justice, 2008, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1335822

Fabien Gelinas (Contact Author)

McGill University ( email )

3644 Peel Street
Montreal, Quebec H3A1W9
Canada

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
120
Abstract Views
780
Rank
419,800
PlumX Metrics