Loyalty and Distinctiveness: A New Approach to the Crown's Fiduciary Duty Toward Aboriginal Peoples

Alberta Law Review, Vol. 40, p. 841, 2002-2003

26 Pages Posted: 16 Feb 2009

See all articles by Michael Coyle

Michael Coyle

University of Western Ontario - Faculty of Law

Abstract

As a tool to protect the distinctive elements of Aboriginal cultures, the Supreme Court of Canada's current approach to s. 35 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms has significant limitations. The judgments in Mitchell v. M.N.R. reflect these limitations, but also hint at the possibility of a fuller, more coherent protection of Aboriginal rights. This paper argues that the Court should recognise that the acknowledged fiduciary relationship between the Crown and Aboriginal peoples requires the Crown to negotiate in good faith the mechanisms necessary for the preservation and flourishing of Aboriginal cultures. The recognition of such a duty to negotiate flows from the historic relationship between the Crown and Aboriginal peoples, and is consistent with the constitutional principles already elucidated in relation to Aboriginal rights in Canada.

Keywords: indigenous rights, aboriginal rights, fiduciary duty

Suggested Citation

Coyle, Michael, Loyalty and Distinctiveness: A New Approach to the Crown's Fiduciary Duty Toward Aboriginal Peoples. Alberta Law Review, Vol. 40, p. 841, 2002-2003, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1344118

Michael Coyle (Contact Author)

University of Western Ontario - Faculty of Law ( email )

London, Ontario N6A 3K7 N6A 3K7
Canada

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
141
Abstract Views
1,040
Rank
370,717
PlumX Metrics